NATIONAL ARBITRATION UPDATE May 18, 20001 UPDATE #33 May 18, 2001 From APWU Executive Vice-President Bill Burrus Washington, DC The process of selecting an arbitrator continues. The FMCS submitted a list of nine nationally recognized arbitrators (who are available) to the parties for joint selection of a single arbitrator. The union’s legal staff and the Industrial Relations Department are reviewing the history of each of the arbitrators, and it is expected that this review process will be completed within the near future. Upon completion of the review, the union will meet with management representatives to begin the striking process which will continue until the list of nine is reduced to a single arbitrator who will be designated as the neutral to decide the APWU national agreement. On May 16, 2001, President Biller and I testified before the Congressional Committee on Government Reform to discuss postal reform. The evening prior to the congressional hearing, the union was provided a copy of a letter from the Postal Board of Governors to the Chairman of the Committee. This letter represented a sneak attack on the collective bargaining rights of postal employees. The Board proposed to grant postal employees the right to strike, but the proposal as written would insure that it would never be exercised in the course of collective bargaining. The proposal included mediation following an impasse in negotiations, with the mediator severely restricted in the standards to be applied to the union’s demands. The mediator would be required to consider: · Welfare of customers · Comparison of wages in entire private sector of employees performing similar work · Overall compensation of employees including wages, vacations, holidays, insurance, pensions, medical and hospitalization benefits and stability of employment. If mediation is unsuccessful, the Mediation board could impose one or more 60-day cooling off periods after which the Congress could impose a settlement based upon the mediation report which considered the above factors. At the conclusion of this process, employees would be permitted to strike. This is a cruel hoax as Congress and the president would never permit postal employees to strike, and future wage increases imposed by Congress would be dictated by the limitations of the Board of Governors’ proposal. While the Board of Governors’ proposal would severely restrict the right of employees to bargain for decent wages and working conditions, it requests that management’s compensation be compared to comparable positions in the private sector making it possible that manager’s salaries could explode; and they would receive the same indecent salaries afforded corporate managers, who rip off the consumers with tens of millions in salaries and even more in stock options. Bargaining-unit employees’ salaries would be compared to employees in the entire private sector performing similar work, while managers’ salaries would be compared to comparable positions. President Biller and I presented testimony that exposed this phony offer of permitting postal employees the right to strike as a condition of postal reform. We also went on record as supporting: · Flexibility in pricing that the Postal Service is permitted to offer volume discounts and compete with UPS and Fed Ex., and · Reduction in the 10-month period required for approval of requested rates to the Postal Rate Commission. We adamantly oppose any changes that impact postal employees’ right to free collective bargaining. While the right to strike would be welcomed and is the ultimate goal of all working people, the phony offer patterned after the Railway Labor Act will not be accepted. President Biller and I also exposed the fallacy of the USPS effort to pressure Congress into enacting reform to avoid projected massive deficits or five-day delivery. While postal management announces an expected deficit of two to three billion dollars, at the end of Accounting Period 8 (of 13) the deficit is 270 million dollars, and first class mail has increased by 1.15 billion pieces. Even though first class mail has increased, the shifting to pre-sort discounts continues to grow, and revenues are below the expected rate. The sky is not falling. The revenue problems would be addressed with the elimination of the unwarranted discounts, and the deficits would be converted to significant surpluses. We hope to join with others in the postal community to enact meaningful reform; however, APWU will not be a party to any effort to weaken employees’ collective bargaining rights. Bill Burrus , Executive Vice President